Monday, 21 May 2012
Redundancy: when there’s no easy option … |
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
Redundancies are very often ill thought-out and rushed through, typically by employers who are under pressure to deliver cost savings within a rigid timeframe, but who have little knowledge of current employment law. They need to step back from knee-jerk reactions, increase planning and take proper advice. It's costly to make redundancies, but it's more costly to end up in a tribunal. Here, Jane Caven summarises the key points for employers:
Employers not only need to tread carefully around, but they also need to be mindful of employment law when they are considering alternatives to redundancy. For example, firms' ability to implement short-term working generally needs to be written into employment contracts or, if redundancy appears to be the only viable alternative, they must negotiate with the employees concerned. Similarly, complex regulations surround the issue of laying off staff and, with the broad exception of the construction industry, here too the ability to implement lay-offs generally needs to be written into contracts of employment. Changes to contracts of employment bring further legal hazards.
If you need to make employees redundant, or are considering alternative measures, it is important to follow the correct procedures. Advice is available to Forum of Private Business members from our helpline on 0845 130 1722 or from our Employment Guide. Visit: www.fpb.org/employmentguide Alternatively, for more information visit www.sagegreen.com or call 01606 333677. This article first appeared in our quarterly member publication Business Insight. Get your copy by email, plus weekly email newsletters and representation to government when you sign up for FREE introductory membership. |