Business solutions
Membership packages
Money-back guarantee
New at the Forum
Why should I join?
Surviving the downturn
Our members
Testimonials
Work for the Forum
News and media
Research
Events
Working with the Forum
Log in


Problems logging in?

Solving late payment means government taking the lead, not more regulation, says business lobby group

  18 September 2008    
Bookmark and Share
 
 
   
  Email article : Print article : More articles like this

With evidence mounting that the problem of late payment is becoming more severe as a result of the economic downturn, the FPB is seeking solutions which avoid adding to the legislative burden, and urging the Government to pay its own suppliers on time.

 


The FPB has written to the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, the Rt Hon Hazel Blears, to emphasise the impact of late payment on small firms, following research in August which revealed that 95% of respondents believe the Government should set an example by paying its suppliers promptly. In addition, 88% said they are not being paid on time, with 56% reporting that late payment has become worse over the past year and 72% that it is having a ‘serious' or ‘very serious' impact on their businesses.

The FPB's Policy Representative, Matt Goodman, recently met with civil servants at the Department of Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (BERR) to discuss the issue. He said that, for small businesses struggling in the current economic climate, receiving timely payments can mean the difference between trading profitably or not at all.

"BERR has acknowledged the impact of late payment on small firms, and is working to ensure that the Government takes the lead on the issue. We have also written to ask Ms Blears to see that it is being addressed at a local level," he said. "Solutions that have been suggested include a public sector code of practice and increased awareness across individual government departments. It was agreed that the way forward must not lead to more regulation, which would simply add to another major problem for small firms. What is needed is a change in the culture of payment."

Currently, firms have a statutory right to interest (SRI) under the Late Payment of Commercial Debts (Interest) Act 1998, allowing them to charge interest on the debt they are owed. However, the FPB is concerned that many fail to do so because they fear that these larger businesses will simply refuse to deal with them again.

The FPB – which maintains a ‘hall of shame' for bigger companies which squeeze their suppliers by imposing unilateral contractual changes and ‘settlement discounts' on invoices – is encouraging its members to report systematic late payers.

Subsequent surveys, including those carried out by the UK 200 Group and Bacs Payment Schemes Ltd have increased pressure on the Government to tackle the problem in order to protect struggling small firms.

In the latter survey, 58% of all respondents said that the economic downturn is adversely affecting them, with almost a third (30%) confirming that it is making the problem of late payment even worse. However, businesses the north of England and Scotland appear to be faring a little better, with 45% saying they have experienced ‘no visible indicators' of the economic slowdown.

Michael Chambers, managing director of Bacs, said: "Unfortunately, the overall results do seem to mirror what's being reported more widely. However, it's good to see that companies in the north of England and Scotland report that they seem to be weathering the initial storm better."

The FPB has outlined the views of members in a paper to the European Commission on late payment, and is protesting against payment abuse as part of its ‘Think Smallest First' campaign. For more information about the other companies ‘named and shamed' by the FPB, visit www.fpb.org/hallofshame or call the member helpline on 0845 130 1722.



Related articles