Tuesday, 22 May 2012
Budget reaction – Forum of Private Business statement |
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
Mr Orford said: "While it's clear that the Government has been listening to our messages about small businesses in the recovery, there's a sense that this was a budget for an election and that the Government is courting the small business vote. "It would have been more encouraging to see some real political responsibility and measures to address difficult issues, like public sector pensions, which we need to tackle in order to keep the UK competitive in the longer term. "My initial reaction is that there was quite a bit of give, give, give in the Budget, but nothing new - and nothing to address the serious issues this country faces. "I cautiously welcome the way the Chancellor acknowledged the importance of smaller businesses to economic recovery. The small-business-friendly measures he announced should be helpful – HMRC's Time to Pay scheme and prompt payment by government bodies emerged as the two most popular forms of government support in a survey of our members this month. "The creation of an adjudicator for firms to go to when they are denied credit by the banks should be useful, but we need to know how the banks will get businesses back through the doors and get the money moving that has been ringfenced for lending. "It was hugely disappointing to hear that the increase in National Insurance contributions will still go ahead, together with the bureaucratic burden small businesses face in administering its threshold. "Small businesses will also have been dismayed by the decision to plough ahead with increases in fuel duty, which came despite Alistair Darling's earlier acknowledgement of the damage high oil prices are wreaking on the economy. "Additionally, the Chancellor failed to acknowledge the regulatory burden smaller businesses face or the urgent need for a re-think of workplace legislation." |