Back to all articles

Deregulation – it may not be sexy but it sure is necessary

Deregulation – it might not inspire much excitement among the masses, but if you’re a small business owner it’s a huge cause for concern.
Regulation imposes a huge cost on SMEs, and the Government does appear to be listening when it comes to slashing just how many there are.
 
But are their attempts to deregulate – and specifically the new announcement of ‘One In Two Out’ – anything more than just rhetoric?
 
We estimate through research with our members that the cost of compliance has risen to £16.8 billion in total. That’s a total of £11.0bn for internal salaried costs, and £5.8bn in external support.
 
This is equivalent to £14,200 per small business.
 
Yet getting businesses interested in government measures to deregulate is hard; it’s hardly a sexy topic. Government initiatives aren’t exactly captivatingly titled – take the ‘Red Tape Challenge’ or ‘Focus on Enforcement’ for example.  Both are recent attempts at engaging the business community through web based, crowd sourcing processes.
 
The Government even needed to be talked out of calling one initiative a ‘clipboard challenge.’
 
But behind the dull exterior is a veritable mine of good will and action.
 
The principle behind the most recent announcement of One In Two Out (OITO) is simple: for every regulation that comes in, double the costs that regulation imposes must be removed. A cynic might say the Red Tape Challenge has allowed the Government to remove archaic and anachronistic legislation that didn’t impact on day to day running of businesses in order to impose new regulations that do, but we don’t think that’s really the case.
 
This cost balance policy (in a former guise) has already reduced net costs on business by almost £1bn since January 2011. For example, construction has been helped by the simplification of guidance on building on contaminated land whilst regulation costs have been removed for hundreds of venues to stage live music.
 
Whilst these are real life examples, OITO should be viewed less as an accounting exercise and more of a statement of intent from the Government. In getting Whitehall to think tangibly and holistically about their impact on business, a gradual culture change is going on which will be for the good of the British economy.
 
OITO forms part of a wider package of deregulatory measures and in the years to come we hope businesses really begin to feel some difference on the ground.

Join the conversation

×